Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit nearing's column >>

NEARING

Thoughts Create. Do The Right Thing.
Articles Posted: 51  Links Seeded: 3639
Member Since: 6/2007  Last Seen: 5/03/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Quote of the Week: the "risk of environmentally induced cancer has been grossly underestimated"

Seeded on Fri May 14, 2010 7:02 PM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: The Atlantic — News and analysis on politics, business, culture, technology, national, international, and food – TheAtlantic.com
health, cancer, public-health, organic-food, environmental-factors, nutritional-sciences
Seeded by nearing
Advertise | AdChoices

Thanks to Nicholas Kristof of the New York Times ("New alarm bells about chemicals and cancer") for telling readers about a report on chemicals and cancer released last week by the President's Cancer Panel.

I had never heard of this panel—appointed during the Bush Administration, no less—and went right to its 2008-2009 annual report (PDF).

The Panel says that the "risk of environmentally induced cancer has been grossly underestimated," that "nearly 80,000 chemicals [are] on the market in the United States, many of which are ... understudied and largely unregulated," and that "the public remains unaware ... that children are far more vulnerable to environmental toxins and radiation than adults."

...evidence suggests that some environmental agents may initiate or promote cancer by disrupting normal immune and endocrine system functions. The burgeoning number and complexity of known or suspected environmental carcinogens compel us to act to protect public health, even though we may lack irrefutable proof of harm.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • nearing's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: America's Need For Change, Brave New World, Citizens Against Apathy, Corporate Watchdogs, Corporatism, Earth News, Environment, environmental justice, FROM THE INSIGHT OUT, Hall of Mirrors, Happy with Corporate America?, HouseWise, LeftWing Warriors, Natural Living , Permaculture, Save Environment Save Wildlife, Science And Technology, The Green Room, The Truth Network, Torture, WTF?
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (4)
nearing

more from the article:

I'm guessing this report will cause a furor. Why? "Lack irrefutable proof" means the science isn't there. In this situation, the Panel advises precaution. Check out these examples selected from the recommendations:


• Parents and child care providers should choose foods, house and garden products, play spaces, toys, medicines, and medical tests that will minimize children's exposure to toxics. Ideally, both mothers and fathers should avoid exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals.

• It is preferable to use filtered tap water instead of commercially bottled water.

• Exposure to pesticides can be decreased by choosing ... food grown without pesticides or chemical fertilizers [translation: organics] and washing conventionally grown produce to remove residues.

• Exposure to antibiotics, growth hormones, and toxic run-off from livestock feedlots can be minimized by eating free-range meat [translation: don't eat feedlot meat].

Expect to hear an uproar from the industries that might be affected by this report. The American Cancer Society (ACS) doesn't like it either (see Denise Grady's take on the report, also in the New York Times), since the report implies that the ACS hasn't been doing enough to educate the public about this issue. The ACS said in a report:

Elements of this report are entirely consistent with the recently published "American Cancer Society Perspective on Environmental Factors and Cancer" ... Unfortunately, the perspective of the report is unbalanced by its implication that pollution is the major cause of cancer, and by its dismissal of cancer prevention efforts aimed at the major known causes of cancer (tobacco, obesity, alcohol, infections, hormones, sunlight) as "focused narrowly" ... it would be unfortunate if the effect of this report were to trivialize the importance of other modifiable risk factors that, at present, offer the greatest opportunity in preventing cancer.

ACS says the Panel does not back up its recommendations with enough research. Maybe, but why isn't ACS pushing for more and better research on these chemicals? However small the risks—and we hardly know anything about them—these chemicals are unlikely to be good for human health. Doesn't precaution make sense? I think so.

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Fri May 14, 2010 7:03 PM EDT
nearing

Save yourself and your family from CANCER!!

EAT and USE ORGANIC ONLY!!

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Fri May 14, 2010 7:04 PM EDT
tgolferman

Great seed young lady! Grow your own as much as you can also. I grow tomatos, black berries, pickles, jalapeno peppers, rasberries, strawberries, and dill. I make a mean hot pickle brine. Eat fresh sun sugar tomatos every morning before birds get too many. When the berries come in we eat them in the morning 4 or with breakfast.

Have you been noticing a lack of interest out here, by the way? My votes and comments is low, but since going google-twitter-bit.ly, I've notice I get way better readership than what appears on the vine. It seems many like to read, but not register which allows voting and commenting. I wonder why it doesn't translate into more vine earnings than it does? Mine are growing, but the time taken to pull readers over here takes from writing time, so I find my self doing my writing right on twitter in little short bursts. Occassionally I create a quick word doc and then take a screenshot and post it to twitpic after I shorten it via bit.ly so I can track whether or not the idea, joke, insight got anywhere.

Good to see you're out here. Go to twitterville, I'm tgolferman there too. If you text, you can set up the profile to go to your phone on direct messages. I've been adding about 15 followers per day on twitter. I'm up to 650 and I'm not doing anything special, just putting my thoughts or links to my articles old and new as they become relevant again, which has been happening of late. Some of my older articles on the collapse seem to get revisited as another announcement of an investigation or indictment occurs. That is kind of cool, seeing something you put much effort into long ago have people remember what you write on and go back and look for more. I did a video on the collapse on Ustream. Pretty terrible, as I have to squeeze this stuff in between working for a living and watching my youngest son play baseball. I was up all night and said what needed to be said. I did it in negative vision so as to keep my Wilson of Tool Time deal going. LOL!

TTYL tgolf Oh by the way, firsty went to twitter. He has a different screen name though. Have not tweeted him since I got his follow. He's been pretty busy. I'd like to see him writing more, he's good. Keep up the great work.

  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Fri May 14, 2010 11:05 PM EDT
GOZO-unlimited

Also pay attention to chemicals used on the skin and scalp...your skin may be a barrier but it soaks up your environment in its respiration...allowing oxygen to permeate the skin feeding deeper soft tissues.

  • 2 votes
#1.3 - Sat May 15, 2010 3:45 PM EDT
Reply
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com