
The US economy will face a "catastrophic collapse" if the government does not bail out the automotive industry, the head of General Motors told lawmakers Tuesday.
"This is about much more than just Detroit," GM chairman and chief executive officer Rick Wagoner said as he joined executives from Ford, Chrysler and the United Auto Workers Union to plead for 25 billion dollars in government-backed loans.
"It's about saving the US economy from a catastrophic collapse."
Right. Like we aren't going to have a crash if we don't give the Big 3 any money. Give me a break with your threats!
Let me check my job description and scan for the keywords "bailing out wasteful, obstinate industry that fought tooth and nail against more efficient and safer cars, and continues to spend more on lobbyists and PR and less on R&D."
Hmm... there must have been some kind of addendum after my lobotomy...
LOL nearing and hot rod. True, I think it's a completely empty threat engineered to scare some money out of Congress, and by extension, us! However; if I have a choice, I'd give my money to the auto industry anyday over crooks like AIG. Sneaky bastards....
Lo, I'll be wiring my life savings into Dick Cheyney's undisclosed bunker.
Screw that, I think it will be safer in his man-sized safe LMFAO! Gotta love Jon Stewart's "You Don't Know Dick" segments :)
More scaremongering...wouldn't having that much less cars on the road translate to having cleaner air to breathe?
I feel that this whole "economic crises" re-aligns what used to be called the American Dream and will make just having a job something worth appreciating.
Yet more comments ignorant of the economics of the situation - the Detroit car companies are tied to suppliers who are tied to ... and suddenly 3 million people are out of work.
This isn't about Detroit, China's auto industry is looking for a bailout from Beijing, while in port near L. A. sits a sea of unwanted import cars; Mercedes, Toyota and Nissan among them
The entire industry is down 15% from last year; who's business model plans for that?
eriq,
Mercedes? the top of wealth isn't buying that many new cars this year? Becasue for sure, the bulk of this nation can not afford these. What with wages that haven't risen, and jobs that are lost or going overseas.......who can afford them? and given the projected outlook, what makes anyone think that those wages will rise in time to make a reorganization at the 3 successful, isn't the cart before the horse here? Unless those cars are being made expressly for the employees of the big 3, cause they will be the only ones who can afford them in any number........and that's only if they don't bust the union. Gee, does anyone else see a cyclical problem here?
And it's 3 million in the first year alone. There will be more than that after the first year. If everything else in the economy were doing well, then it would be appropriate to let the car companies go - in a controlled fashion. But we do not have that luxury now. We need to work to save jobs, and help these companies get on the road to the future of the car industry.
hey nearing................seen this? from khlawake seed http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZiWd0bGAdc
hey nearing................seen this?
I have now.
I have loved Max Keiser for years! I would have his babies.
Right on, Max!!!
lmao..........they have deleted his wiki.
I am sure he is on some hit lists.
The man has some brass cajones.
Bailing out the Big 3 at this point is tantamount to throwing $25 billion down a well. They need to restructure, break the labor unions and give up the lifetime pensions. Detroit was built on a 1950's era paradigm of protectionism and loyalty to American-made products, neither of which exists in 2008. As a result, they are not competitive on the world market and they must be allowed to colapsed or forced to restructure by the American taxpayers, who will become their biggest shareholders should the Government bailout go through.
Congress is right to insist on a plan, but do they have the guts to hold out for something real, or will they fold to the fluff that will come back the first time - better hold their cards for the second bid.
End the Fed
I have been in the automotive repair field for 40 years now and have seen the american automobile go from a machine built to last, to an over-engineered piece of junk built to fail; meanwhile the import industry has grown to something we must accept as better, although they are going to price themselves out of business, too. About forty years ago a station wagon cost about three thousand dollars -- now, about ten to fifteen times that. I don't think my take home pay has increased that much.
I don't think my take home pay has increased that much.
roger that, roger.
I have been in the automotive repair field for 40 years now and have seen the american automobile go from a machine built to last, to an over-engineered piece of junk built to fail;
I don't know about this statement. I have owned at least 8 GM cars over the past 25 years and my 2002 GMC Sierra is by far the best built of them all. It currently has 128,000 miles with not even one minor repair and still on the original brake pads (Yeah... I can't believe that last one either, but it's true). Are you saying a 2008 Malibu is a bigger piece of crap than a 1974 Vega? I doubt that.
I think any bailout should include stipulations that cap the salaries of all employees of companies being bailed out.
As for this article, yeah, scare tactics.
let's try a scenario... the big-3 file bankruptcy, they're bought out (by themselves)and continue operating. meanwhile there is no longer a labor agreement or union power. the only jobs lost are those that refuse to work for a realistic wage and the big-3 are money ahead.
"It's about saving the US economy from a catastrophic collapse."
It's about saving Rick Wagoner's (and all other C-level execs) golden parachute.
Declare Chapter 11 and let Toyota or some other long term thinking smart company buy them out. The union contracts can be renegotiated and plants retooled for more appropriate and appealing vehicles. A bailout is simply rewarding bad, very bad actually, management. Use some of the money for relief and retaining people in the communities affected (not just the workers laid off). A lot of people will lose their jobs regardless. the entire industry is going to contract, a lot, due to structural and inevitable economic changes.
Besides, these so-called "American" companies make many components and assemble vehicles outside teh US, especially in Canada and Mexico, while Toyota, Nissan etc. do all their assembly IN the US to get around import quotas, quotas the "Big 3" (no longer an accurate term by market share) are not subject to.
oops, that should be "retraining" not retaining, although it actually works as well. ;) I would add that some form of investment and economic diversifacation in the affected communities might be worth considering too, in order to better prepare for the coming economic reality, i.e. a post happy-motoring suburban America.
You know....
Our public school system has children selling items to earn money for extrasand the have to match dollar for dollar to get certain grants for school supplies and the music programs. Why can't our government give them this type of option. You need 58 Bil, I tell you what, you come up with 29 Bil and we'll match you but you have two years to pay our 29 Bil back! It's good enough for our inadequate school programs why not industry.
Great, that's just what we need... a parade of Ford salesmen coming to our doors asking if we want to buy some candy so they can keep their jobs.
At least we would have the right to say no thank you we are waiting for chevy. lol
Bottom line is we need to make ceo's accountable if they want to keep the money flowing they need to pay a portion of their fortune to keep the business going.
Lets face it if their not willing to fork over some of what they had gained in profit, then are they truly worth bailing out. I feel bad for the workers who have put years into the job and may lose everything. There should be punishment for ceo's that let their company fail but have billions in their pockets.
I'm right with you Dani.
we all gonna hurt, and the hurtin has to start somewhere.
From FinancialArmagedon.com:
Ben Bernanke said [yesterday] that the TARP plan, and any subsequent debt-financed bail-outs, pose no credit risk to America. That is probably true, but it’s a rather remarkable statement.
We have arrived at our current situation due in part to the insatiable demand for American debt. During the savings glut that characterised much of the past decade governments and individuals desired American assets because they viewed them as relatively risk-free. That enabled the government to run up enormous debts, while facing low real rates (especially on longer-dated securities), and made credit a little too easy.
Now America is counting on its assets' risk-free status to persist. It plans, in fact, to help save the global economy by incurring still more debt. The risk-free perception means that America can borrow whatever it needs for a low cost, and can do so without threatening its risk-free status. This isn't typically how credit-worthiness works.
We have arrived at our current situation due in part to the insatiable demand for American debt. During the savings glut that characterised much of the past decade governments and individuals desired American assets because they viewed them as relatively risk-free. That enabled the government to run up enormous debts, while facing low real rates (especially on longer-dated securities), and made credit a little too easy.
I couldn't agree more.
I actually quoted this article to show how gulible americans are.........sorry I should have added that to the post.
Money is debt...........we are done here.
The government tried once already, and now they are flip-flopping witht the home mortgage industry and its TARP connections. Most of the time the government gets involved in these type of bailout scenarios, things only get worse for many reasons. Market efficiencies are rapidly decreased when the government enforces naive regulation. Why not let the natural forces of the free market work things out by allowing companies to take over ones who are income inadequate? Getting the government involved only further props up our current artificial economy.
The Fed has (apparently) sold bonds with no value and bankrupted this nation. see Nearings seed by Max Kieser..........it wild.
Thanks Nearing;) was looking for that and then discovered the new announcement on Timmy "I'm the new Tres." Geithner.
Why is no one comparing this situation to the airline industry. They took government money and went bankrupt to allow them to rid themselves of the labor contracts that made them uncompetitive.
I know of no other business where labor costs are the root cause of this financial problem.
You might say they built high profit SUV's instead of fuel efficient small cars. I contend that they were forced to maximize profit because they had costs that are due to the labor contracts.
I sure wish I could be paid for not working..
Because there isn't any way to compare this to the airline industry. For example; the airlines do not own their own planes - they do a lease back where the banks own (and depreciate) the planes (then sell them to each other for a capital gain - i.e. lower tax rate). The auto manufacturers must own their plants and machines.
It's not the labor contra cts making them non-competitive nor the products; there is a increasing part of the population that grew up with an identification / appreciation for name brands thinking certain ones are "cool" or better.
A clear example of this would be the Chevrolet Nova, which is also known as a Toyota Corolla, same car, same engine, same assembly plant, same workers; yet many people feel that somehow the Toyota was better quality when anyone would see that it would be the exact same quality. The same goes for Chevcrolet's made by Suzuki (tracker) vs the Suzuki counterpart; Chevrolet's made by Isuzu, Honda's made by Isuzu, etc.
The same way we see a picture on a Toshiba widescreen TV as somehow being brighter than the same tube on a Samsung, which makes it.
The cause of their financial problems are simple - demand suddenly dropped by over 15% for ALL car makers; the Chinese car makers are pushing Beijing for a bail out, there are virtual oceans of Toyotas, Nissans, Mercedes at american ports because the dealers can't sell them.
It's not just the American auto companies.
they can't sell them? NOt enough wealth? or not enough wealthy to buy them all, they are what part of the population? Had to find a way to make that work out didn't we?
Being as this covers the cheapest Nissans and Toyotas to the most expensive Mercedes I don't think "wealth" is the issue; they are every part of the population. People are afraid to spend money, especially big money on cars; and even when they are ready there is little financing available and some people run in to problems there. remember, GM owns GMAC owns Ditech which is a mortgage lender - GM put a lot of money there.
I was talking to a friend today, and we agreed that no plan is perfect, and if this group of elite have been schemeing and planning and weakening our nation, then it is certain that we will come to attention and attend to it.
There are weaknesses in this progress that has been made, and we will find them and our unity in doing so. But......my point was that those who have weakened us can not benefit from our productivity alone. There are not enough elite wealthy individuals in this group to make production possible........we must be part of the consumerism's of those large items. and in thinking about it.....maybe it is time for the average consumer to turn their back on the gluttenous behaviors and decide that we don't need anymore gas hogs, polluting, pieces of metal to get us from a to b. I know I would prefer to get where I need to go without the damage that those automobiles as they have progressed, inflict. So, I change my a to b needs until that issue is addressed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ymbb3v772s&NR=1
time to consider the elements of our current situation has they relate to history.......it has come forward. If no assurances are made then the auto industry will fall because some knew that the american public would balk after bail out of 'banks'.
Steve Forbes said something interesting on Wolf Blitzer's show this morning. The Big 3 produce very fuel efficient cars overseas. However, there are laws in place in the US that prevent these companies from re-importing those vehicles. If Congress wants to help the Big 3, beyond a loan if the companies can put forth reasonable business plans, perhaps they should consider repealing that law - at least temporarily. This would allow the companies to sell cars in the US that people are actually willing to buy while the companies re-tool their US factories to produce these types of cars.
So we would import american cars made overseas.
Rella,
As I'm sure you know, there are countless products designed and marketed by American companies that are built overseas, so I can't see why cars would be any different. My guess is it has to do with labor union contracts, which are likely designed to keep the manufacturing jobs in the US. A good intention for sure, but the high labor rates and benefits make American cars uncompetitive on the world markets, so there is some amount of "protectionism" built into the auto industry. They only survived the past 10 years because of high profit margins on SUVs and trucks sold in the US. (A Suburban has, or had, ten times the profit margin of a Malibu or Toyota Camry) With demand for those products gone, the high profit margins that were supporting the labor contracts are also gone and they can't survive on the low profit margins of the Malibus and Cobalts. Thus, they are bleeding billions every month to pay their labor contract obligations, while not selling very many high-profit margin cars.
Even if they were allowed to import Opal's (A popular GM brand in Europe) I doubt there would be enough production capacity in overseas factories to supply Europe, China AND the US. I addition, we have different safety standards, so the vehicles would have to be redesigned and tested to meet US Federal Safety guidlines. The point is that it is much more complicated than just putting some vehicles on ships and sending them to the local dealers, so retooling American factories and lowering labor costs is the key for the Big 3 going forward. As a side note, Many Big 3 vehicles and parts sold in the US are currently built in Canada and Mexico, but those countries might have an examption as part of NAFTA.
No.
No.
No.
I can see that you don't have an understanding of how cars / markets / countries laws work. The cars they make overseas do NOT meet safety laws, pollution control laws, etc. etc. - they are made for that specific market (and English cars are right side drive, even)
Further, there is no market for these cars yhere as they are underpowered for the american market, are not designed to do freeway speeds all day then turn around and do 10 MPH on a crowded stop-and-go freeway in Phoenix Arizona in the middle of July. You have no idea what the design parameters are for cars; nor the market - American car companies have cars that are in high demand here from everyone but the Yuppies who buy foreign no matter how poorly they fit the use.
There are articles here including some I seeded that there are virtual oceans of Toyotas, Nissans, Mercedes, etc sitting at the docks because the dealers can't sell them; and that doesn't include the American made models sitting at the factories; the whole indiustry has lost 15% of demand due to the credit crunch. Chinese automakers are looking to Beijing for a bailout as they are having problems in their home market.
This isn't about not having the right products, making bad decisions, bad labor contracts or agreements and everything else you hear; it's about people being insecure about their jobs and dealers not having the financing credit they used to.
It's just like Watergate - follow the money
What do you mean, No. No. No.???? Did you read my post?
The cars they make overseas do NOT meet safety laws, pollution control laws, etc. etc. - they are made for that specific market (and English cars are right side drive, even)
This is exactly what I said. I said in post 11.2 "In addition, we have different safety standards, so the vehicles would have to be redesigned and tested to meet US Federal Safety guidlines. "
Further, there is no market for these cars yhere as they are underpowered for the american market, are not designed to do freeway speeds all day then turn around and do 10 MPH on a crowded stop-and-go freeway in Phoenix Arizona in the middle of July.
I agree... In post 11.2 I wrote: "The point is that it is much more complicated than just putting some vehicles on ships and sending them to the local dealers." Although I did not specifically referemce the performance problem it was one of the complications I was alluding to.
This isn't about not having the right products, making bad decisions, bad labor contracts or agreements and everything else you hear; it's about people being insecure about their jobs and dealers not having the financing credit they used to.
It's both really. Even if the credit is available it is easier to justify the purchase of a Civic vs. an Escalade.
the whole indiustry has lost 15% of demand due to the credit crunch.
American car companies have cars that are in high demand here
You mean WERE in high demand here. GM and Ford sales are off 30-40% so a good part of the high demand is gone and probably won't return. Further if the indusrty is down 15% on average some of the manufacturers aren't getting hurt as bad and will recover sooner. However, you are correct about imports piling up on the docks.
I don't disagree with you at all... it is a very complicated issue, which was my point. I do however think you are underestimating the role of the labor unions.
Naftel - this is comment 11.5 which means it refers to 11 (11.0 if you will)
The american cars are still in high demand, no matter how much you want to deny it. American Trucks (like the larger Nissan Titan and Toyota Tundra) are way down (yes the Japanese companies trucks demand is way way down too!) as well as SUV'sw; but Ford, for example, makes Focus, Fusion, Taurus; etc. which are in high demand.
RE: your civic vs. escalade comment - it depends on the purpose; it's hard to justify a civic for a limousine or taxi; etc.
re: your comment about Labor Unions - one of the undiscussed issues is that workers at american factories have been there longer, have higher seniority (and therefore seniority bonuses / raises in their pay) as well as pension benefits, etc. Too many people want to blame labor when labor costs simply aren't that big a component of total costs (in fact advertising is a bigger share of costs; and if you separate management salaries from actual worker salaries, management is a bigger amount and share of costs)
Gotcha... sorry for the misunderstanding. I agree with what you are saying. It is a multi-faceted problem to say the least.
buy a bike.
live and work in the same place.
car pool.
start a bartering business, I bet that is going to go like wild fire soon.
a fix it shop....no more just throwing it away.
buy a bike........you wont' need a doctor, or insurance.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |