
According to a new survey the USA has highest level of illegal cocaine and cannabis use in the world. Thank goodness the War for Drugs is working so well: "The authors found that 16.2% of people in the United States had used cocaine in their lifetime, a level much higher than any other country surveyed (the second highest level of cocaine use was in New Zealand, where 4.3% of people reported having used cocaine). Cannabis use was highest in the US (42.4%), followed by New Zealand (41.9%)". . . Drug use "does not appear to be simply related to drug policy," say the authors, "since countries with more stringent policies towards illegal drug use did not have lower levels of such drug use than countries with more liberal policies." In the Netherlands, for example, which has more liberal policies than the US, 1.9% of people reported cocaine use and 19.8% reported cannabis use.
Thank goodness the War for Drugs is working so well.
Well I think the War on Drugs is in its last days. Not because it has been a dismal failure (it has) or that it has exacerbated the drug problem at a very high nominal and social cost. I think the US government will have to place illegal drug interdiction at a lower priority primarily because it will not have the resources to continue it.
The only copy of National Review I ever paid money for was an issue printed in 1996 (I think, could have been earlier). It was dedicated to how and why the War on Drugs is a failure and why it should be abandoned and replaced with more pragmatic policy. The late William F. Buckley was primarily concerned with the abuses of civil rights that result from the current policy, especially illegal search and seizure. Other contributors discussed economic and political dimensions, and offered approaches that would achieve the goal of reducing overall illicit drug use and abuse without the enormous cost we see today.
It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it. - Upton Sinclair
Like military expenditures, this is a big, high-cost and wasteful suite of government programs that conservatives seem to love and liberal politicians don't dare criticize. The policy has been in place for decades and thus has created an enormous sector that is dependent on continuing the current approach of interdiction and imprisonment. This parasitic constituency is sometimes referred to as the law enforcement-prison-industrial-complex. Like its military counterpart, it is difficult to pare down because it is so very profitable for the political and corporate elite. Life in America is more violent and dangerous as a result. Plus this has created a virtual apartheid as very high numbers of Black, Hispanic and poor Americans are institutionalized during what should be their most productive years. They are often rendered socially and economically dysfunctional for life as a prison record makes them ineligible for gainful employment. It is a sad and tragic example of perhaps the worst public policy of the past 30 or 40 years that has enormous monetary and opportunity costs.
The last president who supported more realistic and pragmatic solutions to the drug problem by the way was Richard Nixon. The nation has been going in the wrong direction on this really since the mid-1970s.
Right on, yia.
It is also worth noting that the status quo drug policy works in the interest of the gun manufacturers because of the raised level of violence. They sell guns to all parties in this, the police, drug dealers and normal citizens. The proliferation of guns on the street (thanks to the well-funded and organized efforts of the NRA and other gun lobbies) combined with the general rise in violent street crimes much of which is directly attributable to the drug war, has created a self-fulfilling prophecy where the gun lobby argument that citizens need guns for protection has merit. It also benefits weapons and military support systems makers since much of the foreign aide to Columbia, Mexico and other countries in Latin America is in the form of military equipment, most of which has little if any applicability to civilian use. All of course at the expense of US taxpayers, or more accurately, at the expense of their children and grandchildren since this goes on the federal credit card. So indeed, it is also in the interests of two other powerful DC lobbying institutions, arms and gun manufacturers. And allows the US to export its stupid policies to countries that use it as an excuse to violate human rights. Oy! It just gets uglier and uglier.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |