Visit nearing's column >>

NEARING

For humanity's sake - legalize marijuana!
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 38; Links Seeded: 3323
Member Since: 6/2007

The Corporate Theft of the Public's Natural Right to Water

advertisement

The Growing Debate on who will Control the World's Water Supply

The current 1.1 billion people worldwide without access to potable water only opens one of the smaller windows on the injustices and the multiple casualties being wrought by private water-related industries. In fact, many are clueless to the magnitude of the victims — present and projected — of the growing water crisis as well as to the inhumane implications of the role of the private sector in regards to treating water as a commodity that can be owned and sold for profit. As of now, 2.6 billion people are at high risk for not having access to potable and an additional 1.8 million children die each year from water-related diseases.

In the mix of chaos, despair, and confusion, which most affects the poorer elements of society, it is important to note the private corporations' role, which some critics have identified as being among the major culprits in causing the crisis. Within recent decades, water privatization firms such as Suez, Vivendi, and RWE have bought control of a number of communities' municipal water services, and then drastically increased the price of water; with some of them failing to effectively purify the water resources they had come to monopolize.

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
31
6.0
{"commentId":1757436,"authorDomain":"nearing"}

For America: Oil today, water tomorrow.

{"commentId":1757436,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"nearing"}
  • 6 votes
Reply#1 - Fri May 2, 2008 7:59 AM EDT
{"commentId":1757548,"authorDomain":"Wheel"}

If the corp'rats' could figure a way to charge for breathing, they would do it. There are states that are verging on undeclared war here in the southeast US because of water and the long term drought we've had here.

{"commentId":1757548,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"Wheel"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#2 - Fri May 2, 2008 8:38 AM EDT
{"commentId":1757556,"authorDomain":"nearing"}

Oh I know, Wheel, it's scary.

I frequent New Mexico several times a year and I am amazed that they still even let golf courses be developed! But they do, more and more of them.

{"commentId":1757556,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"nearing"}
  • 4 votes
#2.1 - Fri May 2, 2008 8:41 AM EDT
{"commentId":1757561,"authorDomain":"Wheel"}

I firmly agree with George Carlin about golf courses. They're the perfect spot for public housing.

{"commentId":1757561,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"Wheel"}
  • 10 votes
#2.2 - Fri May 2, 2008 8:43 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1757773,"authorDomain":"lc3"}

I don't know which is worse, the corporations selling water or consumers being so naive, self-aggrandizing, and easily led astray. Until the recent jump in oil prices, people were paying more for a gallon of imported water than for a gallon of gas. If you're worried about your tap water, get a filter.

{"commentId":1757773,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"lc3"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#3 - Fri May 2, 2008 9:45 AM EDT
{"commentId":1757845,"authorDomain":"nearing"}

yes, or distill it, it tastes great.

{"commentId":1757845,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"nearing"}
  • 3 votes
#3.1 - Fri May 2, 2008 9:58 AM EDT
{"commentId":1757976,"authorDomain":"kidsarocker"}

I wouldn't even trust filtering

{"commentId":1757976,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"kidsarocker"}
  • 2 votes
#3.2 - Fri May 2, 2008 10:26 AM EDT
{"commentId":1758210,"authorDomain":"lc3"}

Mars, do you think the bottled water companies are more trustworthy?

{"commentId":1758210,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"lc3"}
  • 1 vote
#3.3 - Fri May 2, 2008 11:13 AM EDT
{"commentId":1758510,"authorDomain":"kidsarocker"}

None of them are, where is the logic in buying bottled water?

{"commentId":1758510,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"kidsarocker"}
  • 1 vote
#3.4 - Fri May 2, 2008 12:19 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1758222,"authorDomain":"partisanhack"}

A British water company bought our local public utility not long ago and immediately started blackmailing towns by threatening to sell of the undeveloped land surrounding our reservoirs to developers. Water corporations are not good citizens.

And of course the Bushes own land in Paraguay above one of the world's largest aquifers.

It will be nice when we do away with our re-emerging divine right of kings.

{"commentId":1758222,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"partisanhack"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Fri May 2, 2008 11:16 AM EDT
{"commentId":1758239,"authorDomain":"nearing"}

PH, did you seed that?

I might if you didn't.

{"commentId":1758239,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"nearing"}
  • 2 votes
#4.1 - Fri May 2, 2008 11:19 AM EDT
{"commentId":1758248,"authorDomain":"partisanhack"}

It's old news, this has been known for a long time, now.

There's a level of corporatist thinking that believes that monopolies that come along by sheer luck or through guile were God-given.

{"commentId":1758248,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"partisanhack"}
  • 3 votes
#4.2 - Fri May 2, 2008 11:21 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1758887,"authorDomain":"charnello"}

From what I've seen, "water wars" are unlikely. I'm not saying that water concerns are unimportant, far from it, but the "water war" rhetoric generally lacks backing.

I read the Woodrow Wilson Center study, and listened to the project's head talk about it. Based upon what he/they've said, I'm inclined to go with them.

Again, water issues are incredibly important (more important than most people realize, I think), but the "water war" refrain doesn't bear up.

Read an article here

{"commentId":1758887,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"charnello"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#5 - Fri May 2, 2008 1:30 PM EDT
{"commentId":1759677,"authorDomain":"nearing"}

Thanks I will take a look!

{"commentId":1759677,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"nearing"}
  • 2 votes
#5.1 - Fri May 2, 2008 4:43 PM EDT
{"commentId":1759765,"authorDomain":"Wheel"}

I saw 'Say NO to Water Transfer' signs on the way to Asheville the other day. There is conflict over water, financial and political. Transferring water between river basins is hotly contested. The amt and quality of water in downstream states is also a bone of contention. The EPA needs funding and teeth. Industries must be held accountable for their impact on the environment. Corporations are not people, but the people who run the corporations must be held accountable. Due diligence is going to have to give way to environmental accountability.

{"commentId":1759765,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"Wheel"}
  • 4 votes
#5.2 - Fri May 2, 2008 5:06 PM EDT
{"commentId":1759834,"authorDomain":"noe1"}

Stay close to the great lakes in the coming years, the further north the better...

{"commentId":1759834,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"noe1"}
  • 2 votes
#5.3 - Fri May 2, 2008 5:25 PM EDT
{"commentId":1764565,"authorDomain":"Wheel"}

Related story Nearing, I crossed linked your seed to mine. Hope you don't mind.

{"commentId":1764565,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"Wheel"}
  • 2 votes
#5.4 - Sun May 4, 2008 1:29 PM EDT
{"commentId":1764889,"authorDomain":"nearing"}
I crossed linked your seed to mine. Hope you don't mind.

Not at all!

Thanks.

{"commentId":1764889,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"nearing"}
  • 1 vote
#5.5 - Sun May 4, 2008 3:58 PM EDT
{"commentId":1765875,"authorDomain":"mock"}

charnello...

Asked about water wars, Prof. Asit K. Biswas of the Mexico-based Third World Centre for Water Management, told IPS: "This is absolute nonsense because this is not going to happen -- at least not during the next 100 years."

Seems contradictory, no?

It's already starting. I live near the Great Lakes (20% of the world's fresh water) and this is what my hometown paper has to say:

Not A Drop To Spare

Not sure how I feel about this.

More here.

{"commentId":1765875,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"mock"}
  • 2 votes
#5.6 - Sun May 4, 2008 9:44 PM EDT
{"commentId":1765993,"authorDomain":"nearing"}
But Ohio, the other Great Lakes states, and Canada will not and must not ship even one drop of this essential resource elsewhere - at any price.

Wooo, I see a nasty fight on the horizon!

{"commentId":1765993,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"nearing"}
  • 4 votes
#5.7 - Sun May 4, 2008 10:27 PM EDT
{"commentId":1768900,"authorDomain":"inghar2004"}

Yeah, we Canadians may get some help from the states that border the Great Lakes. The day seems ever closer to me.

{"commentId":1768900,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"inghar2004"}
    #5.8 - Mon May 5, 2008 6:13 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1775779,"authorDomain":"charnello"}

    Fights/skirmishes/battles over water are different than a war.

    Nobody is saying conflict over water is unlikely, just that an actual war is.

    {"commentId":1775779,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"charnello"}
      #5.9 - Wed May 7, 2008 1:13 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1765069,"authorDomain":"inghar2004"}

      Thanks for this, nearing. I didn't know that the Walkerton water supply was privatized. Makes sense.

      {"commentId":1765069,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"inghar2004"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#6 - Sun May 4, 2008 5:02 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1770274,"authorDomain":"kidsarocker"}

      Future wars will be fought over resources (gas/oil/water) rather than land and ideologies. better start building my bunker lol

      {"commentId":1770274,"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259","authorDomain":"kidsarocker"}
      • 3 votes
      Reply#7 - Tue May 6, 2008 4:28 AM EDT
      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"258612","isPrivate":false}
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      {"threadId":"258612","contentId":"1465259"}
      Start TrackingStart Tracking
      Stop TrackingStop Tracking